santosmeincke605886

p>While players have long been allowed to charge for access to private Minecraft servers that they control, the company's usage guidelines stress that "all players must have access to the same features" on those servers. https://mpservers.net/ This is in contradiction to the primary reason for NFTs which Mojang defines as "digital ownership that is based on scarcity or exclusion" and is not in line with Minecraft values of creativity, inclusion playing with others and sharing.

/p>

p>Apart from these kinds of philosophical issues, Mojang also expresses concerns about "instances where NFTs were sold at fraudulent or artificially overinflated prices" and instances where NFT assets "may require an asset manager who could disappear without notice." These sorts of issues indicate that "some third-party NFTs may not be reliable and may end up costing the people who purchase them," Mojang warns.

/p>

p>Mojang has left a small sliver of an opening for future NFT applications that could "allow for more secure experiences or other practical and inclusive applications in gaming." The company says it does not have plans to implement blockchain technology in Minecraft.

/p>

p>A rug pull outside?

/p>

p>Mojang's announcement has a huge impact on projects like NFT Worlds. NFT Worlds sells NFTs linked with world seeds that are used for specific Minecraft maps. OpenSea data shows a total NFT Worlds trading volume of over 500.000 Ethereum (worth $76 million at current exchange rates) since its launch last October and individual world tokens selling for an average of 2.5 ETH (about $3700 at present).

/p>

p>The daily trading volume of NFT World tokens has been falling for months along with the overall crypto crash in recent months, however. And the price of the cryptocurrency driving the NFT Worlds project cratered nearly 70 percent immediately following Mojang's announcement Wednesday.

/p>